authorityresearch.com

TAS What Is It?
(The dialectic process of 'change.')
(Personal note.)

by
Dean Gotcher

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

Your ability to reason as well as your ability to read or to write a book, i.e., to be told or to tell others what is right and what is wrong behavior is from God. Nothing else in the creation has that gift. Instead of using reasoning to glorify God, the carnal man uses reasoning to glorify his flesh, rejecting and denouncing God with the very gift God gave him. The "old" world order is reasoning from what you have been told. The "new" from your carnal desires (lusts) of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating. This is TAS, i.e., the negation of the Father's authority being put into praxis so all can lust without having a guilty conscience, i.e., without fear of being judged, condemned, cast into a lake of fire that is never quenched, prepared for the master facilitator of 'change' and all who follow after him.

T stands for thesis, the starting point. A stands for antithesis, T's opposite. S stands for synthesis, what T and A have in common. If we make T (thesis) the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., having to humble, die to, control, discipline, capitulate your self, i.e., deny your lusts in order (as in "old" world order) to do right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, being held accountable, i.e., corrected if you are wrong, chastened if you disobey, judged, condemned, cast out if you question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack the father/Father and his/His authority, i.e., if you, lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., that the current situation and/or object, people, or person is stimulating do your will instead of the father's/Father's and A (antithesis) the child's carnal nature, i.e., your natural inclination (propensity) to lust after the canal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world, i.e., that the current situation and/or object, people, or person is stimulating and to hate restraint, i.e., hate missing out on pleasure (as well as hate being corrected, chastened, judged, condemned, cast out if you do do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., lust) then S (synthesis), i.e., being able to lust after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates without having a guilty conscience, i.e., without fearing being judged, condemned, cast out (which the father's/Father's authority engenders) with everyone's affirmation can not become a reality. The father's/Father's authority system, i.e., having to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth (prejudice) prevents 'change,' i.e., stimulus-response—where lusting after pleasure and hating restraint (stimulus-response) is the law of the land.

"I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet." Romans 7:7

You can not be seduced, deceived, and manipulated if you stay with the father's/Father's authority. You will be if you go with the child's/man's carnal nature. If I gain access to ('discover') your child's self interest, i.e., your child's lusts and offer to "help" your child achieve them or 'create' and environment where your child can experience them without being judged, condemned, cast out, I "own" your child, turning your child against you and your authority. It is just that easy. It worked in the garden in Eden. It works today. By "building relationship upon self interest," i.e., upon lust (covetousness) the father's/Father's authority (restraint) is negated. When you establish right and wrong behavior on dialogue, the father's/Father's authority is negated. There is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue, in and opinion, or in the consensus process. There is only the participants carnal desires of the 'moment,' i.e., lust being 'justified.'

"And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you." 2 Peter 2:3

"If we have the power or authority to establish the necessary conditions, the predicted behaviors [our potential ability to influence or control the behavior of groups] will follow." "We can choose to use our growing knowledge to enslave people in ways never dreamed of before, depersonalizing them, controlling them by means so carefully selected that they will perhaps never be aware of their loss of personhood." "We know how to change the opinions of an individual in a selected direction, without his ever becoming aware of the stimuli which changed his opinion." "We know how to influence the ... behavior of individuals by setting up conditions which provide satisfaction for needs of which they are unconscious, but which we have been able to determine." We can achieve a sort of control under which the controlled though they are following a code much more scrupulously than was ever the case under the old system, nevertheless feel free. They are doing what they want to do, not what they are forced to do." "By a careful design, we control not the final behavior, but the inclination to behavior—the motives, the desires, the wishes. The curious thing is that in that case the question of freedom never arises." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)

"Without exception, [children] enter group therapy [the "group grade" classroom] with the history of a highly unsatisfactory experience in their first and most important group—their primary family [the traditional home with parents telling them what they can and can not do]." "What better way to help [the child] recapture the past than to allow him to re-experience and reenact ancient feelings [resentment, hostility] toward parents in his current relationship to the therapist [the facilitator of 'change]? The [facilitator of 'change'] is the living personification of all parental images [takes the place of the parent]. Group [facilitators] refuse to fill the traditional authority role: they do not lead in the ordinary manner, they do not provide answers and solutions [teach right from wrong from established commands, rules, facts, and truth], they urge the group [the children] to explore and to employ its own resources [to dialogue their "feelings," i.e., their desires and dissatisfactions of the 'moment' in the "light" of the current situation, i.e., their desire for "the group" approval (affirmation)]. The group [children] must feel free to confront the [the facilitator of 'change'], who must not only permit, but encourage, such confrontation [rebellion and anarchy]. He [the child] reenacts early family scripts in the group and, if therapy [brainwashing—washing respect for and fear of the father's/Father's authority from the child's brain (thoughts) ] is successful, is able to experiment with new behavior, to break free from the locked family role [submitting to the father's/Father's authority, i.e., doing the father's/Father's will] he once occupied. . . . the patient [the child] changes the past by reconstituting it ['creating' a "new" world order from his "ought," i.e., a world which "lusts," i.e., a world void of the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience which the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting . . ."]." (Irvin D. Yalom, The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy)

Yalom continued: "In the group not only must the individual strive for autonomy but the leader must be willing to allow him to do so. … an individual's behavior cannot be fully understood without an appreciation of his environmental press. …one member's behavior is not understandable out of context of the entire group. …there is no more important issue than the interrelationship of the group members." "The individual rejects critical feelings toward the group at this time to avoid a state of cognitive dissonance. Long cherished but self-defeating beliefs and attitudes may waver and decompose in the face of a dissenting majority. One of the most difficult patients for me to work with in groups is the individual who employs fundamentalist religious views in the service of denial. The ‘third force' in psychology … which emphasized a holistic, humanistic concept of the person, provided impetus and form to the encounter group … The therapist assists the patient to clarify the nature of the imagined danger and then … to detoxify, to disconfirm the reality of this danger. By shifting the group's attention from ‘then-and-there' [parental authority] to ‘here-and-now' [their feelings of the 'moment'] material, he performs a service to the group … focusing the group upon itself. Members must develop a feeling of mutual trust and respect and must come to value the group as an important means of meeting their personal needs. Once a member realizes that others accept him and are trying to understand him, then he finds it less necessary to hold rigidly to his own beliefs; and he may be willing to explore previously denied aspects of himself. Patients should be encouraged to take risks in the group; such behavior change results in positive feedback and reinforcement and encourages further risk-taking. Members learn about the impact of their behavior on the feelings of other members. …a patient might, with further change, outgrow … his spouse … unless concomitant changes occur in the spouse." (yalom)

"Only a dead father is a good father." "The current generation is the first in the history of the world which has nothing to learn from grandparents;" "Freud noted that patricide and incest are part of man's deepest nature." (Yalom)

"Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual come to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" (Rogers)

"... the hatred against patriarchal suppression—a 'barrier to incest,' ... the desire (for the sons) to return to the mother culminates in the rebellion of the exiled sons, the collective killing and devouring of the father." "'It is not really a decisive matter whether one has killed one's father or abstained from the deed,' if the function of the conflict and its consequences are the same [the father no longer exercises his authority in the home]."(Sigmund Freud in Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: a psychological inquiry into Freud)

"Self-perfection of the human individual is fulfilled in union with the world in pleasure." "According to Freud, the ultimate essence of our being is erotic." "Eros is fundamentally a desire for union with objects in the world." "Eros is the foundation of morality." "The foundation on which the man of the future will be built is already there, in the repressed unconscious [in the carnal nature of the child]; the foundation has to be recovered [the child has to be 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority]." (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History)

"... the 'original sin' must be committed again: 'We must again eat from the tree of knowledge in order to fall back into the state of innocence.'" (Marcuse)

"To experience Freud is to partake a second time of the forbidden fruit;" (Brown)

This is all tied to the use of language, the difference between using discussion or using dialogue in establishing right and wrong behavior, with discussion siding with the father's/Father's authority, with the father/Father having the final say and dialogue siding with the child's/man's carnal nature, i.e., with his lusts and hate of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., that the current situation and/or object, people, or person is stimulating. Lusts is plural in that it is not only lust for pleasure that the current situation and/or object, people, or person is stimulating but also lust for affirmation from others, approving the child's/man's lust for pleasure (which is pleasure in itself).

"There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." Proverbs 16:25

"The words 'seem to' are significant; it is the perception which functions in guiding behavior ['liberating' the child/man from who "IS," i.e., from the Father's authority]." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)

By making dialogue, i.e., the child's/man's perception ("I feel" and "I think," i.e., opinion) the means of establishing right and wrong behavior, the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., discussion (where the father/Father has the final say; "Because I said so," "It is written") is negated. By asking for your opinion, i.e., how you "feel" and what you "think" when it comes to establishing right and wrong behavior instead of asking for your position (which is always given to you) or asking for your position, with you attempting to "defend" it, making it your opinion (your position defends you, when you attempt to defend it it becomes your opinion) I am able to 'liberate' you from the father's/Father's authority a.k.a. his position, i.e., your opinion, i.e., your "feelings" and "thoughts," i.e., your perception having taken its/his/His place. As in the garden in Eden the womens perception, i.e., opinion 'justified' her doing her will instead of God's. (Genesis 3:1-6, where self 'justification' negated Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for lusting, need a savior to escape judment, condemnation, and being cast out in the process) The dialectic process is simply using dialogue to establish right and wrong behavior, negating the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience it engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for lusting. When you bring dialogue, i.e., "I feel" and "I think," i.e., opinion into the study of God's Word it becomes your word, not God's. This what the "churches" (apostate churches) are doing today. In dialogue you are God. In discussion God is God and you are not. As in the garden you can dialogue your opinion regarding all the trees you were commanded to eat the fruit of, i.e., "I like," "I don't like," "I feel," and "I thing." The moment you dialogue regarding the tree you were told not to eat the fruit of you negate God, i.e., you become God

"In an ordinary discussion people usually hold relatively fixed positions and argue in favour of their views as they try to convince others to change." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity)

Discussion emanates from established commands, rules, facts, and truth. Discussion divides upon either being/doing right or being/doing wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., KNOWING from being told, which is formal, i.e., judgmental. The father/Father retains his authority in discussion, i.e., has the final say, i.e., "Because I said so," "Never the less," "It is written." Majority vote retains the father's/Father's authority system although the father might lose out on the particular issue at hand.

"It is usually easier to change individuals formed into a group than to change any one of them separately." (Kurt Lewin in Kenneth Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change)

Discussion maintains fellowship around an accepted command, rule, fact, or truth, with the focus being upon doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth wherease dialogue initiates and sustains relationship around common "feelings" and desires, i.e., self interests, i.e., lusts, with the focus being upon compromise (setting aside established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., suspending the truth, as upon a cross) in order to "get along," i.e., in order to have the approval of men, i.e., in order to 'create' "worldly peace and socialist harmony," i.e., in order to have access to and control of the "cash flow." "Top-down decision making," i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., "prejudice" is negated in dialogue. Under the father's/Father's authority system you can dialogue all you want about what you have been told you can do. You can not dialogue about what you have been told you can not do. If you do the father's/Father's authority is under attack, i.e., is negated since there is no "can not" in dialogue—except telling others what they can not do, you can not tell others what they can not do. Anyone insisting upon discussion, i.e., holding onto established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., bringing the father's/Father's authority system into a room that is using dialogue to establish right and wrong behavior, i.e., to make law is going to be martyred.

"A dialogue is essentially a conversation between equals." "The spirit of dialogue, is in short, the ability to hold many points of view in suspension, along with a primary interest in the creation of common meaning." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity)

Dialogue emanates from the child's (and the facilitator of 'change's, i.e., the psychotherapist's, i.e., the Marxist's) "feelings," i.e., from his "I feel" and/or "I think," i.e., from his opinion, which is informal, i.e., non-judgmental, i.e., open-ended. The child (and the facilitator of 'change,' i.e., the psychotherapist, i.e., the Marxist) retains his carnal nature in dialogue, i.e., has the final say against authority, i.e., against absolutes that get in the way of his natural inclination to lust, i.e., against the father's/Father's authority (system). There is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue, in an opinion, or in the consensus process. There is only the child's (and the facilitator of 'change's,' i.e., the psychotherapist's, i.e., the Marxist's) natural inclination to "lust . . ." being 'justified.' Dialogue moves opinions to a consensus, negating the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience it engenders in the process.

"... the central problem is to change reality.… reality with its 'obedience to laws.'" (György Lukács, History & Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)

"Laws must not fetter human life [inhibit or block lust]; but yield to it; they must change as the needs [the lusts] and capacities [interests/attractions of lust] of the people change." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')

"The philosophers have only interpreted the world in different ways, the objective however, is change." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #11) Inscribed on Karl Marx's tomb so it must be important.

For Karl Marx, the "philosophers" are the father's of the community, i.e., the leaders of nations, divided from one another because of their differing positions on right and wrong behavior. If "worldly peace and socialist harmony" is to become reality it is the father's/Father's authority system, the cause of division amongst "the people" that has to be removed from the environment, i.e., negated in the thoughts and the actions of "the people."

"The dialectical method was overthrown—the parts [the children] were prevented from finding their definition [their identity] within the whole [within the other children, i.e., within "the group," i.e., within society]." (Lukács)

"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself [one's lusts] in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory)

"Group members must be able to synthesize individual 'felt' needs [lusts] with common group 'felt' needs [lusts—turning on those who remain loyal to the father's/Father's authority]." (Warren Bennis, The Temporary Society)

"Only when the immediate interests [lusts, i.e., self interests] are integrated into a total view and related to the final goal of the process do they become revolutionary [overthrowing the father's/Father's authority, making what "the group," i.e., what the many below think (and will do for and to you) more important than what the father/Father, i.e., the one above thinks (and does and will do to you)]." (Lukács)

"Revolutionary violence [overthrow of the father/Father and his/His authority] reconciles the disunited parties [the children/"the people"] by abolishing the alienation of class antagonism [the father's/Father's authority over the children/"the people"] that set in with the repression of initial morality [lust]. … the revolution that must occur is the reaction of suppressed life [hatred toward restraint, i.e., toward authority], which will visit the causality of fate upon the rulers [the parents, the property owner, the business owner, etc., i.e., the father]. It is those who establish such domination and defend positions of power of this sort who set in motion the causality of fate [hate and violence toward them], divide society into social classes [parents over children, owners over workers, God over man, etc.,], suppress justified interests [lusts], call forth the reactions of suppressed life [hate and violence], and finally experience their just fate in revolution [violence against and overthrow of their right of person (individuality, under God), right of conviction (speech and religion), property, and business]." (Habermas) Jürgen Habermas, a Marxist amongst Marxists has established the language of the World Court.

"The justice of state constitutions is to be decided not on the basis of Christianity, not from the nature of Christian society but from the nature of human society." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')

"Every system of law known to civilized society generated from or had as its component one of two well known systems of ethics, stoic or Christian [men's opinions or rule of law]. The COMMON LAW draws its subsistence from the latter, its roots go deep into that system, the Christian concept of right and wrong or right and justice motivates every rule of equity. It is the guide by which we dissolve domestic friction's and the rule by which all legal controversies are settled." (Strauss Vs. Strauss., 3 So. 2nd 727, 728, 1941)

ROE v. WADE, rejecting and in defiance to the Christian faith was based upon stoicism, which was based off of Heraclitus ("Every grown man of the Ephesians should hang himself and leave the city to the boys."), i.e., "there has always been strong support for the view [opinion] that life does not begin until live birth. This was the belief of the Stoics." (ROE v. WADE, 410 U.S. 113 15, 1973)

"The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life)

By making the child's/man's carnal nature, i.e., "feelings," i.e., the "affective domain," i.e., lust for pleasure and hatred toward restraint (what everyone has in common, including the father) the T, thus making the father's/Father's authority system the A, S becomes reality, i.e., all there is to life. This process requires a facililitator of 'change' to come between the children and the father/Father, 'justifying' the children's carnal nature, i.e., their propensity to lust after pleasure and hate restraint, thus 'liberating' the children from the father's/Father's authority, making stimulus-response the law of the land, with the children of disobediance following after, serving, protecting, defending, praising, and worshiping him.

"Once the earthly family [where children learn to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline, capitulate their self in order to do the father's will] is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family [where the Son of God and those who follow him humble, deny, die to, control, discipline, capitulate their self in order to do the Father's will], the former must then itself be destroyed [vernichtet, i.e., annihilated, i.e., negated] in theory and in practice [in the persons personal thoughts and in his social actions]." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #4)

"It is not individualism [the child, humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining, capitulating his "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will] that fulfills the individual, on the contrary it destroys him. Society [the child's desire for approval from others, requiring him to compromise in order to "get along," i.e., in order to "build relationship"] is the necessary framework through which freedom and individuality ["freedom" from the father's/Father's authority and "freedom" to "lust" after pleasure without having a guilty conscience] are made realities." (Karl Marx, in John Lewis, The Life and Teachings of Karl Marx)

The facilitator of 'change' establishes "human nature," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., only that which is "of the world" over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority in order (as in "new" world order) for him to lust after the carnal pleasures of the moment (dopamine emancipation) that the current situation and/or object, people, or person is stimulating without having a guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders), with "the people" or "the person's" affirmation, i.e., approval. Perceiving his self as being the personification of "the people," who, like him lust after the carnal pleasures of the moment the world stimulates, he sees it his duty to 'justify' "the people" natural inclination to lust in order to 'justify' his natural inclination to lust. When you question his actions he will respond with "It is not just about you," really meaning "It is all about me, so I can lust after pleasure without having a guilty conscience, with your affirmation. If you refuse to affirm me, i.e., my lusts or get in my way 'the people' will remove (negate) you (since having 'justifying' their lusts I now 'own' them). It appears I must keep an eye on you from now on for my 'good.'" The meaning of "sight based management."

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

"Bypassing the traditional channels of 'top-down' decision making [negating the father's/Father's authority while establishing policy and/or making law] our objective center's upon transformation public opinion into an effective instrument of global politics." "Individual values must be measured by their contribution to common [lust] interests and ultimately to world interests, transforming public consensus into one favorable to the emergence of a stable and humanistic world order." "Consensus is both a personal and a political step. It is a precondition of all future steps." (Ervin Laszlo, A Strategy For The Future: The Systems Approach to World Order)

"The heart is deceitful above all things [thinking pleasure, i.e., lust is the standard for "good" instead of doing the father's/Father's will], and desperately wicked [hating anyone preventing, i.e., inhibiting or blocking it from enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' it lusts after]: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9

It can not see its hatred toward the father's/Father's authority as being evil, i.e., "wicked," i.e., "desperately wicked" because its lust for pleasure is standing in the way, 'justifying' the hate. (Mark 7:21-23) When you question the facilitator of 'change's' actions he will respond with "It in not just about you," really meaning "It is all about me, so I can lust after pleasure without having a guilty conscience, with your affirmation. If you refuse to affirm me, i.e., my lusts or get in my way 'the people' will remove (negate) you (since having 'justifying' their lusts I now 'own' them). It appears I must keep an eye on you from now on for my 'good.'" The meaning of "sight based management."

"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')

In other words lust, i.e., enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or object, people, or person is stimulating, i.e., establishing lust over and therefore against the father/Father's authority that gets in the way reconciles us to the world. Self is thus actualized in the world that stimulates lust.

"The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 36:1-4

"For the wicked boasteth of his heart's desire, and blesseth the covetous, whom the LORD abhorreth. The wicked, through the pride of his countenance, will not seek after God: God is not in all his thoughts." Psalms 10:3, 4

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," "open ended, non-directed," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority, i.e., no established aka absolute command, rule, facts, or truth to be accepted as is, by faith and obeyed; there is only the person's carnal desires, i.e., lusts of the past and the present being verbally expressed and 'justified'), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—as predators, charlatans, pimps, pedophiles, seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline, capitulate your "self" (your lusts) in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12

© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2023 (10/24/2023)